Stand Up Guys Review


There was a time when men were men; when a man’s word was inviolate and as good as gold. There was a time long before swag when panache was supreme. I am of course referring to a hypothetical golden age which never actually existed, but it’s this time which Stand Up Guys nevertheless harkens back to. Painting the modern gangster as a romanticized urban cowboy isn’t exactly breaking new ground, but imagining what life would be like after their heyday proves to be an enjoyable and uniquely engrossing experience.

Directed by the generally inexperienced Steven Fisher, and featuring some truly exceptional cinematography from Michael Grady, Stand Up Guys is a visually enthralling film and it’s the subtle things that make a huge difference. Masterful lighting, a provocative palate and even the simple use of lines and space put in on, or at least very close to, the the level of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, which I still consider to be a benchmark of excellence as far as visuals are concerned.

Starring the legendary talents Al Pacino, Christopher Walken, and Alan Arkin, the amount of star power we’re working with here is almost overwhelming. Walken’s calm, almost effortless charisma serves as the ideal foil for Pacino’s larger-than-life personage. With Arkin in the mix, even for a short time, it’s a tag team worthy of the history books. All three perform virtually without flaw as their respective clever-by-half characters spout some slightly Tarrantino-esque dialogue, simultaneously providing comic relief and context into the deeply fraternal relationship of these men.

The thing that I really appreciate about Stand Up Guys is that it knows how to have fun without being a one trick pony, so to speak. Given the strengths of each of its cast members and direction, it could have easily crossed the line into gritty monotony and simply stayed there for the duration of the production. Instead, the trio know how to both make us laugh with witty dialogue and also make us feel some heavy emotion in the appropriate situations. Furthermore, the film is paced in such a way that the tonal transitions don’t seem abrupt and inelegant, but rather seem to flow naturally and effortlessly, which undeniably helps keep things interesting.

A dyed-in-the-wool comedy, this film is not, in the same way that it isn’t solely a drama or action movie either. A drama would be closer to the mark, however, with some action/adventure elements added in along with tasteful and well-timed comedic relief. Genre bending films, at least in my experience, seem to enrage many critics (probably because their carefully categorized movie collections become jumbled) but I find that ambiguous themes, plot elements, and genre classification, so long as they’re done correctly, can be incredibly refreshing and may nudge an otherwise decent film into the realm of greatness. Granted, in an attempt to branch out, a film might find itself in a ‘jack of all trades, master or none’ kind of situation, in which case I would likely commend it for at least trying to mix things up.

This film is definitely for a certain kind of person. Yes, you can enjoy the film if you appreciate the talents of Walken, Pacino, and Arkin. Yes, you can likewise enjoy it if you want something that changes up the tried and true action formula. It’s the fans of the larger than life and sometimes melodramatic crime movies of the 80’s who will appreciate Stand Up Guys most of all though. In some ways, though not quite in the way one would expect, the film is a heartfelt, brilliantly acted, visually beautiful love letter, pining for days gone by.

Rating: 4 out of 5

PS: Oh yeah, the sound track was pretty good, too.

2 thoughts on “Stand Up Guys Review

  1. michaelpiggott February 19, 2013 / 9:14 am

    Great review, well written. I rarely read film blog reviews all the way through, but yours was a joy to read. Massive fan of the three leads (who isn’t?) so I plan to see this soon. Also, is that the main movie poster in your review or an alternative artwork? Seems too cool and leftfield for the standard one.

  2. Albert Cantu February 19, 2013 / 12:03 pm

    Thank you very much for your support. It’s one of my main concerns as a critic that people don’t read the article and end up just glancing at the score at the bottom of the page. Actually, that is the official poster. I think they did a great job with it myself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s