Disturbo 13: Salo, The 120 Days of Sodom


Part 1 of 13, excerpted from an essay entitled “Disturbo 13: The Most Disturbing Horror Films Ever Made” by Stanley Wiater.

The last film from controversial Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, Salo is a well-mounted adaptation of the infamous work by the Marquis de Sade. Updated to World War II when the Fascists have overtaken Italy, this movie is almost unwatchable because it makes a heartfelt attempt to be as disgusting cinematically as de Sade (the man who gave sadism its very name) was in print.

The plot line has a group of adolescents being used as human fodder to satisfy the perverted desires of a band of Fascists who have occupied a castle in war-torn Italy. The Fascists are also using the spoken memoirs of several prostitutes to ignite their already sick imaginations—as then they endeavor to carry out the most perverse scenarios the human mind can devise.

What Pasolini supposedly was attempting to de here was concoct a parallel between the depravity of de Sade with the depravity of the Fascist state which was Italy in World War II. However, Pasolini seems to relish staging the obscene tableaus in all their loathsomeness far more than condemning them. Beyond the numerous rapes (both heterosexual and homosexual) and sexual perversions, we are shown extremely realistic scenes of young people being forced to dine on a meal of cooked shit, people urinating or shitting on one another, or choking on broken glass hidden in apparently edible food.

Whatever the moral intentions may have been, Pasolini wallows so deeply in the filth that it’s impossible to do anything but have an automatic gag reflex to the entire motion picture.

2 thoughts on “Disturbo 13: Salo, The 120 Days of Sodom

  1. geelw September 21, 2014 / 3:33 pm

    I made it through this once and it’s a tough one to recommend (he said, putting it mildly), but it exists and I’d say if one has the time and tolerance for it, it’s something to be seen. Granted, there is rougher (and real-life) stuff than this out there, but I don’t go anywhere near that content.

  2. Gregoryno6 September 21, 2014 / 7:52 pm

    Banned in Australia from 1975 to 1993. Ban reimposed in 1998. DVD release authorised in 2010.
    This isn’t the first time our censors have behaved in this way. Catcher In The Rye was banned in 1956, after being freely available since 1951. And an album from local band Skyhooks was declared obscene a year after it went on sale.
    Comment about Salo from the 2010 news story:
    “I’ve seen it and its the sort of film you wish you could unsee. This being said, I’d rather have the choice and regret it, rather than having some nanny state thinking it knows best.”
    Me, I’ll happily live Salo-free.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s